WaterLilies
The EI Wellspring

Practical Information for Coping with
Chemical and Electrical Hypersensitivity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

header image

Select documents from the industry's campaign to fight the acceptance of MCS in the 1990s

CMA Environmental Illness briefing (1990)   PDF ONLY The chemical industry's call to arms to fight the acceptance of MCS.

American Petroleum Institute MCS Forum (1990)

API MCS forum invitation (1990)   PDF ONLY The American Petroleum Institute convened a forum to discuss what to do about MCS.

Forum Agenda   PDF ONLY

BCIA Handout   PDF ONLY

Grassroots Groups Report (1991)   PDF ONLY A public relations firm reports on MCS activists, with another call to arms.

MCS Symposium Trip Report (1992)   PDF ONLY An anti-MCS symposium was held in Washington DC in 1992. Even this tobacco company representative found it one-sided.

Industry Fronts

ACSH Press Release (1993)   PDF ONLY Press release accusing physicians helping people with MCS of money-grabbing.

Harrison Activities Report (1992)   PDF ONLY This public relations firm organized the front group TIEQ for R.J. Reynolds Tobacco. It funneled money to the anti-MCS symposium listed above and to Dr. Gots, who was a very vocal opponent of MCS.

ESRI Kick-Off Meeting (1995)   PDF ONLY The Environmental Sensitivities Research Institute was clearly created to fight MCS.

Tobacco Money for ESRI (2001)   PDF ONLY Philip Morris tobacco company was a major contributor to ESRI.

BCIA Front Group

BCIA and Dow Chemical at National Academy of Science MCS Workshop (1991)   PDF ONLY

BCIA Board Meeting, January 1991   PDF ONLY BCIA was a front for the chemical industry. It opposed limits on indoor air pollution and the acceptance of MCS. It lobbied US Congress ("The Hill"), see item IV.

BCIA Board Meeting, January 1992   PDF ONLY When the Federal agency Housing and Urban Development accepted MCS, the BCIA president went there in person to protest (item 3).

BCIA Letter to HUD (1992)   PDF ONLY Letter sent to Housing and Urban Development asking them to reconsider their acceptance of MCS. It worked, the agency then became hostile towards people with MCS.

The 1996 New Mexico Campaign

When the state of New Mexico in 1996 considered accommodating people with MCS, industry lobbyists showed up in force.

Albuquerque Chamber Alert   PDF ONLY

Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association   PDF ONLY

Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Assoc   PDF ONLY

Environmental Sensitivities Reseach Institute   PDF ONLY

Ciba-Geigy   PDF ONLY

Tobacco Industry

People with MCS were sickened by second-hand tobacco smoke, which was a threat to Big Tobacco.

Burson-Marsteller Organizes Anti-MCS Book   PDF ONLY Tobacco public relations firm faxed early outline of book which was later named "Phantom Risk" and had a full chapter on MCS (originally called Clinical Ecology).

Tobacco Institute Consultant (1992)   PDF ONLY A professor dismissive of MCS in several articles receives money from Tobacco Institute.

Anti-MCS Article Draft   PDF ONLY Draft of anti-MCS article sent to Philip Morris tobacco company for comment. It was published in 1992 in Environmental Technology by professor Witorsch, who was a consultant for the Tobacco Institute (see above).

Tobacco Lobbyists Fight EPA Indoor Air Quality (1995)   PDF ONLY

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2007–2026    |    disclaimer    |    privacy    |    contact